Friday, 31 January 2014

Netflix TV on demand

Netflix (NFLX) is the world's leading internet television network. It is not a pay per view but an unlimited viewing service that charges a flat fee of US$7.99 per month. It's 45.8 million users view more than one billion hours of TV and movies per month. According to some statistics NFLX video usage is more than 10x its rivals Amazon and Hulu. The same article states that NFLX represented 31.6% of all downstream traffic September prime time in the US with Youtube second at 18.6%.

Apps replacing channels
The overall industry is benefiting from the tailwinds of increased internet adoption, frustration with linear TV, increasing cable pricing and its advertising. Even NFLX's competitor Hulu which had 3 CEOs in 2013 grew paid subscribers an impressive 65%. The majority of NFLX's viewing is on internet TVs but tablets and phone viewing are growing with many subscribers using Netflix on multiple screens. NFLX started out as a DVD mailing service and began offering its streaming service in 2007. It is now moving towards more exclusive content arrangements which cost more but allow NFLX to offer a differentiated service similar to HBO and its series.

Even quarterly earning calls are semi-exciting
Earning calls tend to be dreary and staid events. NFLX has ramped up the excitement factor by conducting its quarterly earning results over Youtube. NFLX further increased the excitement factor (see video below) by joking that a competitor HBO CEO's password is 'Netflix B*tch' in response to a question that HBO does not mind customers sharing passwords for free viewing. Its classic viewing if you're into watching quarterly company reports.



Fuzzy connections?
The main risk apart from continuing execution against competitors is internet neutrality. In other words all data on the internet is treated equally there has been no discrimination of charging users differently because of the content or site. This has been challenged recently so now a domestic ISP can legally impede the video streams or charge NFLX or its users more otherwise they could slow or limit the streaming experience. NFLX does not believe it is too much of an issue because these same companies are growing their broadband business but it is something investors should keep an eye out for.

The other risk which is also an opportunity are content payment obligations. As of the end of 2012 NFLX had $5.6 billion of off balance sheet obligations, basically payments for content that are fixed. The risk for NFLX is if a large number of subscribers cancel NFLX it still has to pay a fixed amount for its content. Given the recent large increase in subscribers this is looking less and less likely.

Going global
NFLX has 34.3 million subscribers out of nearly 110 million households in the US. The next major growth area is international currently at 11.5 million paying subscribers. The international division is not yet profitable but with planned moves into Germany and France the fourth and sixth largest broadband markets in the world this should quickly change. NFLX has said in the past that Canada broke even within two years.



Generally content is bid for on a country by country basis. The beauty of NFLX's model is that its original pieces such as Orange is the new Black and House of Cards not only attract users to the service but are also multi-territory so they only pay once but monetise around the world. The market is focused on subscribers because NFLX generally pays a fixed fee for a defined time period, obviously adding more subscribers is extremely profitable. NFLX trades on a high 79x earnings multiple and has a large market value of $24 billion but there is upside in subscriber growth and pricing. NFLX have hinted at future price increases at only $7.99 a month it is too low compared to the average cable bill of  US$78.

For consumers the only problem for consumers is choice, you can spend more time searching for something to watch than actual watching!  Unfortunately NFLX is not yet available in Australia consumers here should stay tuned.

Jason


Disclosure: Decisive has no position in Netflix (NFLX) stock 

The material in this article is for informational purposes only and in no way constitutes a solicitation of business or investment advice. The material has been prepared without regard to any client's or other person's investment objectives. Before making an investment decision you should consider the assistance of a financial adviser and whether any investment or service is appropriate in light of your particular investment needs.

Thursday, 23 January 2014

On track with Rentrak

The TV measurement industry is not one of the most glamorous in the media world but they tend to produce great monopoly like businesses. Everyone has probably heard of Nielsen and their rating and measurement system. While the credit rating industry has Moody's and S&P as fierce competitors the TV rating system has been dominated by one company Nielsen. We found it strange that Nielsen has not yet made any major changes to its measurement given all the disruption in media ie TV everywhere, on demand and big data trends. Enter Rentrak (RENT) stage left, RENT has basically built up a better mousetrap for measuring TV viewing. What makes them different is precision, RENT is the only one to measure video on demand 100m TVs on a daily basis whereas Nielsen for example samples 20,000 with viewers filling out paper diaries of what they watched that night.

Census vs sample, whats gives you more confidence?
Anyone who has used Netflix or other streaming services knows on demand viewing is the way of the future. RENT collects 100% of this US on demand TV viewing. From the computer to your smartphone and to your tablet RENT tracks your viewing habits. RENT data is more comprehensive as it is a census approach rather than a sample method like competitors. RENT's database is larger because RENT collects data from households subscribing to Dish Network. Dish owns 6% of the stock in return for passing on their data. This precision gives ad buyers confidence.



Source: Rentrak investor presentation

RENT has 235 local station clients up from zero 3 years ago, as can be seen below the total addressable market is 2,000 stations. 50 of these stations have dropped Nielsen since signing up for RENT's products. RENT predicts their TV measurement business to grow 80% over the next several years.


                                                     Source: Rentrak investor presentation


Skip scene, the domino effect
While the stock has had a major rise since the start of the year in our opinion the rise has been justified. The shares rose on the announcement of landing CBS as a customer. CBS is one of the four largest broadcast networks in the US and under the CEO Les Moonves has been an innovator in the space. TV companies love data and with RENT can move beyond just age/sex demographics to combine viewing data with purchase data like cars and other product purchases. With CBS signed up it is a vote of confidence in their measurement system making it much more likely that the other networks will sign on with the service helping to make it the currency of measurement much like Nielsen. RENT has an expensive valuation but it is a very strategic company for the industry with its market capitalisation of $675 million still small given the opportunity.

Fast forward or rewind? Why 20% growth is misleading.
While overall top line growth does not look exciting at 20% this growth is being held back by RENT home entertainment business which basically measures DVD transactions from brick and motor stores. Given the outlook for such businesses like Blockbuster are not great RENT is expected to divest this business which should result in higher overall top line growth of 40%.

As consumer viewing habits change measurement has to change as well. While its not the most exciting business RENT is at the forefront of precisely measuring movies and TV everywhere the consumer is watching.

Jason


Disclosure: Decisive has a long position in Rentrak (RENT) stock 

The material in this article is for informational purposes only and in no way constitutes a solicitation of business or investment advice. The material has been prepared without regard to any client's or other person's investment objectives. Before making an investment decision you should consider the assistance of a financial adviser and whether any investment or service is appropriate in light of your particular investment needs.

Sunday, 5 January 2014

The two search engines that matter

Happy New Year everyone. Continuing off from the last blog the two major global search engines Google and Baidu (China only) have now released their top ten trending search items over the past year.


1. Nelson Mandela
1. Ya’an Earthquake
2. Paul Walker (Fast & Furious actor)
2. Five Policies of Real Estate Regulation
3. Iphone 5s
 3. H7N9 Virus
4. Cory Monteith (Glee actor)
4. Shenzhou 10 (Chinese spacecraft)
5. Harlem shake
5. Hazy Weather
6. Boston Marathon
6. Diaoyu Islands (Island conflict with Japan
7. Royal Baby
7. Inheritance Tax (rumour of introduction has since been denied)
8. Samsung Galaxy S4
8. Two-child Policy (If one parent is an only child they can now have two children)
9. Playstation 4
9. Central Patrol Group (corruption investigation)
10. North Korea
10. Internet Finance


The most popular global searches on Google were for people who had recently passed away, this unfortunately included Nelson Mandela the most searched for trend in the year. Electronics were the next important items with smartphones in particular popular search items.

The desolation of smog!

For all the talk about the Chinese consumer none of their top ten searches involved a product they were more practical. The most disturbing search pattern was the search for hazy weather while the most searched for term in China was weather (not a trend but as a keyword) the number one Chinese keyword in 2013. Baidu capitalised on this trend with any searches on Baidu showing weather forecasts as well as a life quality index for activities such as car washing and sports.

This growing concern over the environment also showed up on Taobao the leading online commerce site in China. One of the most searched for items was dust masks and heating equipment. People in Jiangsu province purchased the most followed by Beijing.

Phones and games

Baidu's top searches help explain some of Apple's problems, it is only the third most popular searched for phone in China. While Apple products as a whole are popular Samsung seems to be selling better due to the larger screen and is the top ranked search item. Apple also faces local competitors like Xiaomi who better understand local needs.

One major discrepancy between Google and Baidu searches is in consoles with no searches in China. Rumours are that the Xbox One will be heading to China in September 2014. Game consoles have been banned in China since 2000 so as to protect Chinese youth from wasting their minds on computer games. However the internet has helped circumvent the ban with online gaming the norm. Rumours are that the bans will soon been fully lifted hopefully producing a big boost to the Xbox One and PlayStation 4.

1. iPhone 5s
1. Samsung Galaxy S4
2. Samsung Galaxy S4
2. Xiaomi 3
3. Playstation 4
 3. iPhone 5S
4. Xbox One
4. Meizu MX2
5. Nexus 5
5. HTCM7
6. HTC One
6. Xiaomi Hongmi
7. iPad Air
7. Apple Macbook Pro
8. Blackberry 10
8. Apple Mac Air
9. Samsung Galaxy Note 3
9. Lenovo Y470
10. Nokia Lumia 1020
10. Dell 14 R

Jason


Disclosure: Decisive has no position in Google (GOOG) and Baidu (BIDU) stock 

The material in this article is for informational purposes only and in no way constitutes a solicitation of business or investment advice. The material has been prepared without regard to any client's or other person's investment objectives. Before making an investment decision you should consider the assistance of a financial adviser and whether any investment or service is appropriate in light of your particular investment needs.